PhiloType
Answer 36 questions about everyday situations to find which of the 16 types your thinking is closest to, and which philosophers share that type.
Free · No sign-up · 36 questions (about 8 minutes)
KantThe First Principle
HobbesThe First Principle
PlatoThe Architect of the Ideal
AristotleThe Architect of the Ideal
Marcus AureliusThe Sage in Practice
SenecaThe Sage in Practice
BuberThe Keeper of Bonds
RousseauThe Keeper of Bonds
HusserlThe Dissector of Truth
GödelThe Dissector of Truth
PlotinusThe Voyager to the Source
EckhartThe Voyager to the Source
SchopenhauerThe Liminal Pilgrim
PascalThe Liminal Pilgrim
LevinasThe Witness of Transcendence
JaspersThe Witness of Transcendence
HabermasThe Systematic Critic
BenthamThe Systematic Critic
HegelThe Architect of History
DeweyThe Architect of History
BeauvoirThe Liberator
FanonThe Liberator
LaoziThe Living Way
HeraclitusThe Living Way
DerridaThe Unweaver
FoucaultThe Unweaver
LacanThe Conceptual Alchemist
BaudrillardThe Conceptual Alchemist
CamusThe Defiant Existentialist
MontaigneThe Defiant Existentialist
NietzscheThe Unbound Affirmer
KierkegaardThe Unbound AffirmerThe four letters of a type are the answers to four questions. Each question has two possible answers, which makes sixteen combinations.
LATSThe First Principle“So, what's the conclusion?”
LATEThe Architect of the Ideal“This is how it's supposed to be.”Coming soon
PATSThe Sage in Practice“In the end, the people who just quietly do the work are the strongest.”Coming soon
PATEThe Keeper of Bonds“Once you decide to trust people, you don't have to keep second-guessing.”Coming soon
LAISThe Dissector of Truth“Strictly speaking, that's not right.”Coming soon
LAIEThe Voyager to the Source“There's got to be something deeper at the root.”Coming soon
PAISThe Liminal Pilgrim“…I don't think it's that simple, though.”Coming soon
PAIEThe Witness of Transcendence“I can't explain it, but I know this much is true.”Coming soon
LKTSThe Systematic Critic“So who actually benefits from this system?”
LKTEThe Architect of History“All this friction? I'd say it means we're about to move forward.”Coming soon
PKTSThe Liberator“You do see that's not right, don't you?”Coming soon
PKTEThe Living Way“Not pushing back is stronger in the end.”Coming soon
LKISThe Unweaver“Is that really “natural”?”Coming soon
LKIEThe Conceptual Alchemist“Isn't that the same as that other thing? They look nothing alike, though.”Coming soon
PKISThe Defiant Existentialist“There's no meaning in it, but I'll do it anyway.”Coming soon
PKIEThe Unbound Affirmer“Bored? Then just change the whole way you do it.”PhiloType is a free service that organizes how you think and make judgments in everyday situations into four axes and 16 types. After answering 36 questions, you learn which type is closest to you and which philosophers share that type. It focuses on ways of thinking rather than personality, and treats the result as a tendency at that point in time.
PhiloType classifies how you make judgments and what convinces you in everyday situations along four axes. The axes are Logic and Empathy (L/P), Essence and Change (A/K), Whole and Individual (T/I), and Skepticism and Openness (S/E), and they combine into 16 types. The result page for each type lists philosophers who share that tendency in thinking, as thinkers who came before you.
There are 36 questions: 32 about the four axes and 4 about interpretation and intervention. The test takes about 8 minutes, and you answer each question on a 7-point scale. A detailed version with over 100 questions is in preparation.
They are two ways of relating to the world within the same type. Interpreters tend to find joy in understanding the world and finding meaning; Interveners tend to find joy in acting on the world and changing it. This is judged from four questions, separately from the four-letter type. Because it rests on only a few questions, the result page shows it as a tendency.
No. The questions are about everyday situations and use no philosophical terminology. PhiloType is designed as an entry point to philosophical ways of thinking, not as academic philosophy.
The test and the result page are free, and you can take the test without signing in or registering an email address. Save the URL of your result page to come back to it later.
PhiloType uses four original axes designed from philosophical concepts and is separate from the MBTI instrument. MBTI is a trademark or registered trademark of The Myers & Briggs Foundation in the United States and other countries. PhiloType is not affiliated with the Foundation or with The Myers-Briggs Company.
It can. The result is based on your answers at that time, so if you take the test again later, axes marked as close calls in particular may move to the opposite pole.
That feeling is itself a clue. Check the axis scores on your result page for axes marked as close calls. If you are near the opposite pole, also read the guides for the types listed under “Similar types.” No type is better than another, and an unexpected result is an entry point to a new way of thinking.
Philosophers are classified by how they developed their thinking rather than by the topics they wrote about. Each axis has a decision test, such as which one a thinker ultimately follows when logical analysis and lived conviction conflict. As a result, placements can differ from classifications based on major works, textbook impressions, or answers from AI assistants.
No. Your answers are scored with a predefined method, and the type is determined from that score. The philosopher portraits are illustrations produced with image-generation AI.
Yes. The result page has a share button for X and a copy-URL button, and a share image is generated automatically. Result pages are not indexed by search engines, so only people you give the URL to can view them.
PhiloType does not guess other people’s types or judge compatibility between types. No type is better than another, so please do not use results to evaluate or exclude other people. If you are curious about someone, suggest they take the test themselves.
Please do not use it for hiring, placement, performance reviews, or similar decisions. PhiloType is designed as a starting point for self-understanding and conversation, and its validity as a test of ability or aptitude has not been established.
No. PhiloType is not intended for medical or psychological diagnosis, or for measuring intelligence or ability. If you have concerns about your physical or mental health or about developmental characteristics, please consult a medical professional.
You can take the test without signing in, and your answers and result are stored anonymously. Anyone who has the URL of a result page can view that result. We do not collect your name or email address during the test. Stored data is used as statistics that do not identify individuals, to improve the questions and scoring.
Free · No sign-up · 36 questions (about 8 minutes)

The four axes that classify thinking styles: their oppositions, questions, theoretical sources and classification criteria.
The grounds for using 32 questions to classify the four axes in the base quiz, from three angles: psychometric research, the question counts of similar services, and taking the tests ourselves.