The 16 philosophical thinking types
LLogosAArchēTTelosSSkepsis
The First Principle
At the end of all doubt stands a truth that cannot be shaken.
Catchphrase: So, what's the conclusion?

The four axes
The four letters of LATS are answers to four questions. Each question has two possible answers, and the combinations give the 16 types. The First Principle answers L, A, T, S.
What convinces you?
LLogicLogos
Convinced when the reasoning holds together
PEmpathyPathos
Convinced when it feels right
What do you build your thinking on?
AEssenceArchē
Thinks from a foundation that does not change
KChangeKinesis
Thinks in motion, while things are moving
What matters most to you?
TWholeTelos
Rules and purposes that apply to everyone
IIndividualIdion
What belongs to one person and one moment, and cannot be replaced
How do you approach something new?
SSkepticismSkepsis
Doubts first, accepts after checking
EOpennessEros
Gets interested first, accepts it, then goes deeper
About The First Principle
The First Principle does not trust “somehow.” When things get decided by custom, by the mood in the room, or by “everyone says so,” they feel uneasy. To say they “know” something, they need grounds that are truly certain. To them, confidence without grounds is just an assumption.
Descartes, deciding to “doubt everything,” was following the same impulse. Strip away every assumption, start from the one thing left, “I who am doubting certainly exist,” and rebuild the world from there. This intellectual scrupulousness lies at the root of how the First Principle thinks.
What others notice
- Strength
Decides quickly. Can reach a conclusion the moment the information is in.
- Both sides
Always gives a reason when changing their mind. In other words, never takes a position back without one.
- Watch out for
When a discussion drags on, cuts in with “So, what's the conclusion?” Sees no value in the process itself.
In everyday life
- Work
- Vague instructions and “let's just try it” are hard for them. They want the overall direction and its grounds made clear before they act. In a meeting, they are the one who asks, “What is that based on?” People sometimes find this tiresome, but the question saves the team from big oversights.
- Relationships
- They take time to build trust. They don't take people at their word right away. They judge by whether someone's actions stay consistent. Once they trust someone, though, they are extremely loyal, and that trust does not waver easily.
- Decisions
- They make a point of not being swept along by emotion. They draw a clear line between “is it right?” and “does it feel good?” and put the first one first. In heated arguments they can end up isolated, but afterwards people often say, “The one who stayed calm was right.”
Biases to watch for
Confirmation bias
Once something seems “certain,” they stop looking for evidence against it.
The two variants of The First Principle
Interpreters want to understand the world. Interveners want to change it.
- Interpreter
- They think principles through and organize them into theory. Working in the study, Kant built a system around the question “What can a human being know?”
- Intervener
- They design the structures of states and societies based on principles and take part in real politics. In an age of civil war, Hobbes set out the form of a state that could stop the fighting.
Representative philosophers
One Interpreter and one Intervener.
Interpreter
Immanuel Kant
“the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me” (Kant, Critique of Practical Reason)
Intervener
Thomas Hobbes
“a war of every man against every man” (Hobbes, Leviathan)
Philosophers of the same type
- Bertrand Russell
- John Rawls
- René Descartes
- Francis Bacon
- John Locke
A first book
Critique of Pure ReasonKant
The original model of the attitude “doubt everything first, then believe.” Start with an introductory guide to it.
Similar types
LAISThe Dissector of Truth
Both dislike vague talk. The First Principle wants to decide “so what do we actually do,” while the Dissector of Truth wants to check “is that word being used correctly.”
- LKTSThe Systematic Critic
Both care about the rules of society. The First Principle thinks “go back to the principles and the answer follows,” while the Systematic Critic asks “who benefits from those principles?”
Opposite type
All four axes on the opposite side.
Would you be willing to live this life again, over and over, forever?
Personal GuideComing soon
- Reading your axis scores: close calls, neighboring types
- Handling your thinking habits: causes, ways of thinking to adopt, how to run a discussion
- Relationships and work: getting along with each type, ways of working that suit you
- A reading guide of nine books: three starting points, three that unsettle you, three next steps
- The philosophers closest to you, with profiles of the top three
Find your type
Answer 36 questions about everyday situations to see where you stand on each axis and which type is closest to you.
Free · No sign-up · 36 questions (about 8 minutes)
All 16 types
Philosophy of OrderAT
- LATSThe First Principle
- LATEThe Architect of the IdealComing soon
- PATSThe Sage in PracticeComing soon
- PATEThe Keeper of BondsComing soon
Philosophy of TruthAI
- LAISThe Dissector of TruthComing soon
- LAIEThe Voyager to the SourceComing soon
- PAISThe Liminal PilgrimComing soon
- PAIEThe Witness of TranscendenceComing soon
Philosophy of HistoryKT
- LKTSThe Systematic Critic
- LKTEThe Architect of HistoryComing soon
- PKTSThe LiberatorComing soon
- PKTEThe Living WayComing soon
Philosophy of LiberationKI
- LKISThe UnweaverComing soon
- LKIEThe Conceptual AlchemistComing soon
- PKISThe Defiant ExistentialistComing soon
- PKIEThe Unbound Affirmer
