16philotype
  • Test
  • 16 types
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • About
16philotype

16 philosophical thinking types to sharpen how you think.

© 2026 PhiloType

About PhiloType
  • Test
  • About
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • Before you use PhiloType
  • Contact
Legal
  • Terms of Service
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
Language
  • 日本語
  • English
  • Test
  • 16 types
  • Blog
  • FAQ
  • About
  • The 16 philosophical thinking types

    LLogosAArchēTTelosSSkepsis

    The First Principle

    At the end of all doubt stands a truth that cannot be shaken.

    Catchphrase: So, what's the conclusion?

    Kant

    The four axes

    The four letters of LATS are answers to four questions. Each question has two possible answers, and the combinations give the 16 types. The First Principle answers L, A, T, S.

    1. What convinces you?

      LLogicLogos

      Convinced when the reasoning holds together

      PEmpathyPathos

      Convinced when it feels right

    2. What do you build your thinking on?

      AEssenceArchē

      Thinks from a foundation that does not change

      KChangeKinesis

      Thinks in motion, while things are moving

    3. What matters most to you?

      TWholeTelos

      Rules and purposes that apply to everyone

      IIndividualIdion

      What belongs to one person and one moment, and cannot be replaced

    4. How do you approach something new?

      SSkepticismSkepsis

      Doubts first, accepts after checking

      EOpennessEros

      Gets interested first, accepts it, then goes deeper

    About The First Principle

    The First Principle does not trust “somehow.” When things get decided by custom, by the mood in the room, or by “everyone says so,” they feel uneasy. To say they “know” something, they need grounds that are truly certain. To them, confidence without grounds is just an assumption.

    Descartes, deciding to “doubt everything,” was following the same impulse. Strip away every assumption, start from the one thing left, “I who am doubting certainly exist,” and rebuild the world from there. This intellectual scrupulousness lies at the root of how the First Principle thinks.

    What others notice

    • Strength

      Decides quickly. Can reach a conclusion the moment the information is in.

    • Both sides

      Always gives a reason when changing their mind. In other words, never takes a position back without one.

    • Watch out for

      When a discussion drags on, cuts in with “So, what's the conclusion?” Sees no value in the process itself.

    In everyday life

    Work
    Vague instructions and “let's just try it” are hard for them. They want the overall direction and its grounds made clear before they act. In a meeting, they are the one who asks, “What is that based on?” People sometimes find this tiresome, but the question saves the team from big oversights.
    Relationships
    They take time to build trust. They don't take people at their word right away. They judge by whether someone's actions stay consistent. Once they trust someone, though, they are extremely loyal, and that trust does not waver easily.
    Decisions
    They make a point of not being swept along by emotion. They draw a clear line between “is it right?” and “does it feel good?” and put the first one first. In heated arguments they can end up isolated, but afterwards people often say, “The one who stayed calm was right.”

    Biases to watch for

    1. Confirmation bias

      Once something seems “certain,” they stop looking for evidence against it.

    Read how to counter themPersonal Guide

    The two variants of The First Principle

    Interpreters want to understand the world. Interveners want to change it.

    Interpreter
    They think principles through and organize them into theory. Working in the study, Kant built a system around the question “What can a human being know?”
    Intervener
    They design the structures of states and societies based on principles and take part in real politics. In an age of civil war, Hobbes set out the form of a state that could stop the fighting.

    Representative philosophers

    One Interpreter and one Intervener.

    • Interpreter

      Immanuel Kant

      “the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me” (Kant, Critique of Practical Reason)

    • Intervener

      Thomas Hobbes

      “a war of every man against every man” (Hobbes, Leviathan)

    Philosophers of the same type

    • Bertrand Russell
    • John Rawls
    • René Descartes
    • Francis Bacon
    • John Locke

    A first book

    Critique of Pure ReasonKant

    The original model of the attitude “doubt everything first, then believe.” Start with an introductory guide to it.

    Similar types

    • LAISThe Dissector of Truth

      Both dislike vague talk. The First Principle wants to decide “so what do we actually do,” while the Dissector of Truth wants to check “is that word being used correctly.”

    • LKTSThe Systematic Critic

      Both care about the rules of society. The First Principle thinks “go back to the principles and the answer follows,” while the Systematic Critic asks “who benefits from those principles?”

    Opposite type

    PKIEThe Unbound Affirmer

    All four axes on the opposite side.

    Would you be willing to live this life again, over and over, forever?

    Personal GuideComing soon

    • Reading your axis scores: close calls, neighboring types
    • Handling your thinking habits: causes, ways of thinking to adopt, how to run a discussion
    • Relationships and work: getting along with each type, ways of working that suit you
    • A reading guide of nine books: three starting points, three that unsettle you, three next steps
    • The philosophers closest to you, with profiles of the top three

    Find your type

    Answer 36 questions about everyday situations to see where you stand on each axis and which type is closest to you.

    Take the free test

    Free · No sign-up · 36 questions (about 8 minutes)

    All 16 types

    Philosophy of OrderAT

    • LATSThe First Principle
    • LATEThe Architect of the IdealComing soon
    • PATSThe Sage in PracticeComing soon
    • PATEThe Keeper of BondsComing soon

    Philosophy of TruthAI

    • LAISThe Dissector of TruthComing soon
    • LAIEThe Voyager to the SourceComing soon
    • PAISThe Liminal PilgrimComing soon
    • PAIEThe Witness of TranscendenceComing soon

    Philosophy of HistoryKT

    • LKTSThe Systematic Critic
    • LKTEThe Architect of HistoryComing soon
    • PKTSThe LiberatorComing soon
    • PKTEThe Living WayComing soon

    Philosophy of LiberationKI

    • LKISThe UnweaverComing soon
    • LKIEThe Conceptual AlchemistComing soon
    • PKISThe Defiant ExistentialistComing soon
    • PKIEThe Unbound Affirmer